Answer by the rule that applies to that cohort
Statute, curriculum and resolution resolved as one thing, in the version of the year of entry. The registrar stops applying the new curriculum’s rule to someone who started under the old one.
The statute, the curriculum, the faculty board resolution and the call for applications say different things about the same situation. Strattum resolves that as one governed context and serves it to the AI your teams already use.
Statute, curriculum and resolution resolved as one thing, in the version of the year of entry. The registrar stops applying the new curriculum’s rule to someone who started under the old one.
Enrolment, transcript, finance, financial aid and earlier contacts resolved as the same person. The student stops telling the same story at three counters.
The registrar, the programme office, the portal and chat all answer from the same document in force. The answer stops varying with whoever picked it up.
Each of them today ends in an email to the programme office, a hunt through old resolutions, or a report built by hand.
The statute, the curriculum of their year of entry and the resolution that changed the criterion arrive as one answer. The query stops depending on who remembers what year the rule changed.
Academic, financial and aid records arrive together, with the rule that applies to that category. The registrar opens the case knowing what is actually blocking enrolment.
Curriculum structure, board decisions, accreditation items outstanding and what is in the evaluation cycle. What is a long conversation with the person who left becomes an on-demand answer, drawn from the programme’s own minutes and documents.
Enrolment, re-enrolment, performance and finance read together by term. When attrition rises in one specific term, the factor arrives tied to the data that exposes it.
Context is versioned per document, with its effective date. The answer carries the version that applied in that student’s year of entry and cites the provision, so the person can open it and check. Where a later resolution changed the criterion only for new entrants, the answer shows both and says which applies.
It does, and that is the point. Strattum reads both with your own tenant’s credentials and resolves the student as one person, with enrolment, transcript, finance and aid linked. The gain is not replacing a system, it is no longer sending the student from one counter to another to assemble what the institution already holds.
Connectors preserve source permissions and the filter is applied before ranking. Data that member of staff may not see never enters the material the answer is built from, so it does not appear even as a citation. Every query stays traceable. Details on /governance.
No. Strattum is the layer between those systems and the AI. They remain the system of record. What changes is that the rule, the student and the finances get resolved as one thing when someone asks.
A generic assistant answers from whatever it can search, and at an institution with curricula from several years that means confidently citing another cohort’s rule. What is missing is not the model, it is the context: which version applies to that entry year, which enrolment belongs to that student, what that member of staff is entitled to see.
Inside your cloud. The entire platform is deployed in your infrastructure: AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI or on-prem. Strattum has no runtime access to the data, and your records, credentials, keys and network access never leave it.
Strattum
