Schemas, incidents, tickets and the conversations that decided each one, in one context. The team asks why something is the way it is and gets the decision, with the thread that produced it.
Today the answer is scattered across PRs, threads and postmortems. With the context unified, it is one query.
The schema says what is there. The ticket that asked for it, the discussion that decided it and the incident that forced it ended up in three different tools. Resolved as one context, the answer arrives with its reason attached.
Why was this column added, and in which ticket?Postmortem, on-call thread and the commit that fixed it, linked to the same symptom. Whoever is paged at three in the morning stops depending on remembering that it already happened in March.
Have we seen this error in production? What fixed it?The team queries one context over MCP instead of maintaining an integration per system. The ontology is versioned in Git and lineage says where each attribute came from, source to answer.
Which services read this table today?
