ERP, supplier master, mandatory safety indices and signed contracts in one context. Qualification answers by tax ID, with the source of every figure and the rule that applied on the date.
Today they cross three platforms, two teams and a spreadsheet, and the answer takes three weeks to a month. With the context unified, they are one query.
Mandatory safety indices, the last three years of revenue and how much the contracts already signed represent of it, resolved as one supplier. The review that today crosses three platforms and ends in a spreadsheet answers by tax ID.
Does supplier 12.345.678/0001-90 qualify for a R$ 200M bid with a 24-month term?The same tax ID appears ten times in the supplier master, and searching by that tax ID sometimes returns none of them. Resolved as one entity, a supplier stops being rejected because the review landed on the wrong record.
Which record for this supplier carries the current indices and contracts?Today the answer arrives as approved or rejected, without the figure that produced it. The opinion names the index that fell outside the threshold, the financial dependency it measured, and the source of each, at the version in force on the date of the query.
If I take this supplier forward anyway, what is the contracting side exposed to?
